Bloody irritating, that is. There is a preponderence of evidence, if I may borrow a legal phrase, in favor of evolution. There is a preponderance of evidence (earthquakes, plagues, famines, me) against any non-evil God. In addition, there are several logical holes in the concept of God as traditionally portrayed. It thereby follows that it is more likely that evolution is true than divine creation is. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence, after all.
no subject
Date: 2003-05-29 09:57 pm (UTC)